Am 12.05.22 um 18:05 schrieb Stefano Garzarella:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 05:44:13PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:30:48PM +0200, Fabian Ebner wrote:
>>> On 64-bit platforms, SIZE_MAX is too large for max_pdiscard, which is
>>
>> The main problem is that SIZE_MAX f
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 05:44:13PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:30:48PM +0200, Fabian Ebner wrote:
On 64-bit platforms, SIZE_MAX is too large for max_pdiscard, which is
The main problem is that SIZE_MAX for an int64_t is a negative value.
int64_t, and the follo
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:30:48PM +0200, Fabian Ebner wrote:
On 64-bit platforms, SIZE_MAX is too large for max_pdiscard, which is
The main problem is that SIZE_MAX for an int64_t is a negative value.
int64_t, and the following assertion would be triggered:
qemu-system-x86_64: ../block/io.c:
On 64-bit platforms, SIZE_MAX is too large for max_pdiscard, which is
int64_t, and the following assertion would be triggered:
qemu-system-x86_64: ../block/io.c:3166: bdrv_co_pdiscard: Assertion
`max_pdiscard >= bs->bl.request_alignment' failed.
Fixes: 0c8022876f ("block: use int64_t instead of in
