; Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 14/17] intel_iommu: piotlb invalidation should
>> notify unmap
>>
>>
>>
>> On 24/07/2024 07:45, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF wrote:
>>> Maybe I'm missing something but why do we invalidate device IOTLB
>>> upon piotlb receipt of a re
>-Original Message-
>From: CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 14/17] intel_iommu: piotlb invalidation should
>notify unmap
>
>
>
>On 24/07/2024 07:45, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF wrote:
>> Maybe I'm missing something but why do we invalidate devic
On 24/07/2024 07:45, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something but why do we invalidate device IOTLB
> upon piotlb receipt of a regular IOTLB inv desc?
> I don't get why we don't wait for a device IOTLB inv desc?
I thought you were planning to remove that after the last rfc versi
Maybe I'm missing something but why do we invalidate device IOTLB
upon piotlb receipt of a regular IOTLB inv desc?
I don't get why we don't wait for a device IOTLB inv desc?
On 18/07/2024 10:16, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> Caution: External email. Do not open attachments or click links, unless this
>
This is used by some emulated devices which caches address
translation result. When piotlb invalidation issued in guest,
those caches should be refreshed.
Signed-off-by: Yi Sun
Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan
---
hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 35 ++-
1 file changed, 34 i
