On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 01:58:07PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Stefano Garzarella writes:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 10:15:27PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >> From: Peter Xu
> >>
> >> We should only pass in gdb_get_reg16() with the GByteArray* object
> >> itself, no need to shift. Withou
On 4/10/20 3:08 PM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 10:15:27PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
From: Peter Xu
We should only pass in gdb_get_reg16() with the GByteArray* object
itself, no need to shift. Without this patch, gdb remote attach will
crash QEMU.
Fixes: a010bdbe719 ("e
Stefano Garzarella writes:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 10:15:27PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> From: Peter Xu
>>
>> We should only pass in gdb_get_reg16() with the GByteArray* object
>> itself, no need to shift. Without this patch, gdb remote attach will
>> crash QEMU.
>>
>> Fixes: a010bdbe71
On 4/9/20 2:15 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> From: Peter Xu
>
> We should only pass in gdb_get_reg16() with the GByteArray* object
> itself, no need to shift. Without this patch, gdb remote attach will
> crash QEMU.
>
> Fixes: a010bdbe719 ("extend GByteArray to read register helpers")
> Signed-off-b
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 10:15:27PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> From: Peter Xu
>
> We should only pass in gdb_get_reg16() with the GByteArray* object
> itself, no need to shift. Without this patch, gdb remote attach will
> crash QEMU.
>
> Fixes: a010bdbe719 ("extend GByteArray to read register h
From: Peter Xu
We should only pass in gdb_get_reg16() with the GByteArray* object
itself, no need to shift. Without this patch, gdb remote attach will
crash QEMU.
Fixes: a010bdbe719 ("extend GByteArray to read register helpers")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Sign