On 07.11.21 11:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 10:21:33AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Let's not focus on b), a) is the primary goal of this series:
>>
>> "
>> a) Reduce the metadata overhead, including bitmap sizes inside KVM but
>> also inside QEMU KVM code where pos
On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 10:21:33AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's not focus on b), a) is the primary goal of this series:
>
> "
> a) Reduce the metadata overhead, including bitmap sizes inside KVM but
> also inside QEMU KVM code where possible.
> "
>
> Because:
>
> "
> For example, when
On 07.11.21 09:14, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 06:10:13PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 02.11.21 18:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 12:55:17PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 02.11.21 12:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, No
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 06:10:13PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 02.11.21 18:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 12:55:17PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> On 02.11.21 12:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:33:55AM +0100, David Hildenbran
On 02.11.21 18:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 12:55:17PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 02.11.21 12:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:33:55AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 01.11.21 23:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Oc
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 12:55:17PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 02.11.21 12:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:33:55AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> On 01.11.21 23:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:45:19PM +0200, David Hildenbran
On 02.11.21 12:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:33:55AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 01.11.21 23:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:45:19PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
This is the follow-up of [1], dropping auto-detection and vho
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:33:55AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 01.11.21 23:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:45:19PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> This is the follow-up of [1], dropping auto-detection and vhost-user
> >> changes from the initial RFC.
> >>
On 01.11.21 23:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:45:19PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> This is the follow-up of [1], dropping auto-detection and vhost-user
>> changes from the initial RFC.
>>
>> Based-on: 20211011175346.15499-1-da...@redhat.com
>>
>> A virtio-mem devic
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:45:19PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> This is the follow-up of [1], dropping auto-detection and vhost-user
> changes from the initial RFC.
>
> Based-on: 20211011175346.15499-1-da...@redhat.com
>
> A virtio-mem device is represented by a single large RAM memory regio
This is the follow-up of [1], dropping auto-detection and vhost-user
changes from the initial RFC.
Based-on: 20211011175346.15499-1-da...@redhat.com
A virtio-mem device is represented by a single large RAM memory region
backed by a single large mmap.
Right now, we map that complete memory region
11 matches
Mail list logo