On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 3:43 PM Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > So going back to the original issue, is the proposed patch something
> > that could work for you in the short term before a better solution
> > will be implemented or is there something we should change?
>
> Given that apparently it was always
Am 18.11.2024 um 18:06 hat Jakub Jelen geschrieben:
> Hi Kevin,
> Sorry for the delay, my gmail filters will need some love to handle this
> high-traffic mailing lists so I can catch replies ...
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 6:49 PM Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > [...]
> > Hm, after looking some more at the
Hi Kevin,
Sorry for the delay, my gmail filters will need some love to handle this
high-traffic mailing lists so I can catch replies ...
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 6:49 PM Kevin Wolf wrote:
> [...]
> Hm, after looking some more at the code, I agree that it can't have
> worked, for the simple reason
Am 14.11.2024 um 17:49 hat Jakub Jelen geschrieben:
> Hello,
> comments inline below.
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 4:21 PM Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > I'll just note that I'm only forwarding on the patch from Jakub.
> > > I didn't write it.
> > >
> > > I did lightly test it, and it seems
Hello,
comments inline below.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 4:21 PM Kevin Wolf wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I'll just note that I'm only forwarding on the patch from Jakub.
> > I didn't write it.
> >
> > I did lightly test it, and it seems to work. However it seems also
> > likely that it is causing qemu to b
Am 13.11.2024 um 14:00 hat Richard W.M. Jones geschrieben:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 03:02:59PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > Heh. I was creating a qemu bug report on gitlab when this email arrived :)
> >
> > 13.11.2024 14:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >From: Jakub Jelen
> > >
> > >The li
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 03:02:59PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Heh. I was creating a qemu bug report on gitlab when this email arrived :)
>
> 13.11.2024 14:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >From: Jakub Jelen
> >
> >The libssh does not handle non-blocking mode in SFTP correctly. The
> >driver c
Heh. I was creating a qemu bug report on gitlab when this email arrived :)
13.11.2024 14:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
From: Jakub Jelen
The libssh does not handle non-blocking mode in SFTP correctly. The
driver code already changes the mode to blocking for the SFTP
initialization, but for som
From: Jakub Jelen
The libssh does not handle non-blocking mode in SFTP correctly. The
driver code already changes the mode to blocking for the SFTP
initialization, but for some reason changes to non-blocking mode.
This used to work accidentally until libssh in 0.11 branch merged
the patch to avoi