On 8/15/21 11:03 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 21:10, Richard Henderson
wrote:
On 8/13/21 3:18 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
+void force_sig_fault(int sig, int code, abi_ulong addr)
Better as abi_ptr?
I followed the same type used for 'addr' in the target_siginfo_t
struct def
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 21:10, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> On 8/13/21 3:18 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > +void force_sig_fault(int sig, int code, abi_ulong addr)
>
> Better as abi_ptr?
I followed the same type used for 'addr' in the target_siginfo_t
struct definition.
-- PMM
On 8/13/21 3:18 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
+void force_sig_fault(int sig, int code, abi_ulong addr)
Better as abi_ptr?
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
r~
In many places in the linux-user code we need to queue a signal for
the guest using the QEMU_SI_FAULT si_type. This requires that the
caller sets up and passes us a target_siginfo, including setting the
appropriate part of the _sifields union for the si_type. In a number
of places the code forgets
