Re: [PATCH for-10.1 06/10] ui/vdagent: replace Buffer with GByteArray

2025-05-09 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 3:31 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 07:59:28PM +0400, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote: > > From: Marc-André Lureau > > > > Buffer is slightly more advanced than GByteArray, since it has a > > cursor/position. But vdagent code doesn't need it.

Re: [PATCH for-10.1 06/10] ui/vdagent: replace Buffer with GByteArray

2025-05-09 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 07:59:28PM +0400, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Marc-André Lureau > > Buffer is slightly more advanced than GByteArray, since it has a > cursor/position. But vdagent code doesn't need it. This simplify a bit > the code, and migration state. > > Signed-off-by:

[PATCH for-10.1 06/10] ui/vdagent: replace Buffer with GByteArray

2025-03-11 Thread marcandre . lureau
From: Marc-André Lureau Buffer is slightly more advanced than GByteArray, since it has a cursor/position. But vdagent code doesn't need it. This simplify a bit the code, and migration state. Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau --- ui/vdagent.c | 25 - 1 file changed, 12 in