On 05.04.23 16:25, Antonio Caggiano wrote:
Hi David,
On 05/04/23 15:23, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 05.04.23 14:57, Antonio Caggiano wrote:
Introduce a MemoryListener callback for address space map events.
Why?
Please, have a look at the cover letter "[PATCH RFC 0/1] MemoryListener
addre
Hi David,
On 05/04/23 15:23, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 05.04.23 14:57, Antonio Caggiano wrote:
Introduce a MemoryListener callback for address space map events.
Why?
Please, have a look at the cover letter "[PATCH RFC 0/1] MemoryListener
address_space_map callback" with a detail explan
On 05.04.23 14:57, Antonio Caggiano wrote:
Introduce a MemoryListener callback for address space map events.
Why?
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Introduce a MemoryListener callback for address space map events.
This will require a change to the memory listener callbacks: while it
currently uses "self" as first argument for the callbacks, this new
approach is going to use an "opaque" member, effectively following the
model used for MemoryRe
Introduce a MemoryListener callback for address space map events.
This will require a change to the memory listener callbacks: while it
currently uses "self" as first argument for the callbacks, this new
approach is going to use an "opaque" member, effectively following the
model used for MemoryRe
