Re: [PATCH RESEND] docs: clarify absence of set_features in vhost-user

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 04:19:26PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Alex Bennée writes: > > > Alyssa Ross writes: > > > >> The previous wording was (at least to me) ambiguous about whether a > >> backend should enable features immediately after they were set using > >> VHOST_USER_SET_PROTOCOL_FEAT

Re: [PATCH RESEND] docs: clarify absence of set_features in vhost-user

Alex Bennée writes: > Alyssa Ross writes: > >> The previous wording was (at least to me) ambiguous about whether a >> backend should enable features immediately after they were set using >> VHOST_USER_SET_PROTOCOL_FEATURES, or wait for support for protocol >> features to be acknowledged if it

Re: [PATCH RESEND] docs: clarify absence of set_features in vhost-user

Alyssa Ross writes: > The previous wording was (at least to me) ambiguous about whether a > backend should enable features immediately after they were set using > VHOST_USER_SET_PROTOCOL_FEATURES, or wait for support for protocol > features to be acknowledged if it hasn't been yet before enabli

[PATCH RESEND] docs: clarify absence of set_features in vhost-user

The previous wording was (at least to me) ambiguous about whether a backend should enable features immediately after they were set using VHOST_USER_SET_PROTOCOL_FEATURES, or wait for support for protocol features to be acknowledged if it hasn't been yet before enabling those features. This patch a