Il ven 11 lug 2025, 04:26 Xiaoyao Li ha scritto:
> BTW, the user's value of "pmu" and "invtsc" are still broken for TDX
> case. tdx_cpu_instance_init() will always overwrite "pmu" and "invtsc"
> even if users explicitly request a different value via "-cpu" option.
>
> Will we leave it as intenti
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 02:06:03AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 02:06:03 +0200
> From: Paolo Bonzini
> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] target/i386: move accel_cpu_instance_init to
> .instance_init
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.50.0
>
> With the reordering
On 7/11/2025 8:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
With the reordering of instance_post_init callbacks that is new in 10.1
accel_cpu_instance_init must execute in .instance_init as is already
the case for RISC-V. Otherwise, for example, setting the vendor
property is broken when using KVM or Hypervisor.
With the reordering of instance_post_init callbacks that is new in 10.1
accel_cpu_instance_init must execute in .instance_init as is already
the case for RISC-V. Otherwise, for example, setting the vendor
property is broken when using KVM or Hypervisor.framework, because
KVM sets it *after* the us
