On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:22:06PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Our code to identify syscall numbers has some issues:
> * for Thumb mode, we never need the immediate value from the insn,
>but we always read it anyway
> * bad immediate values in the svc insn should cause a SIGILL, but we
>
Our code to identify syscall numbers has some issues:
* for Thumb mode, we never need the immediate value from the insn,
but we always read it anyway
* bad immediate values in the svc insn should cause a SIGILL, but we
were abort()ing instead (via "goto error")
We can fix both these things
