Re: [PATCH 35/46] qom: Use return values to check for error where that's simpler

On 6/24/20 11:43 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: When using the Error object to check for error, we need to receive it into a local variable, then propagate() it to @errp. Using the return value permits allows receiving it straight to @errp. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster --- qom/object.c | 1

[PATCH 35/46] qom: Use return values to check for error where that's simpler

When using the Error object to check for error, we need to receive it into a local variable, then propagate() it to @errp. Using the return value permits allows receiving it straight to @errp. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster --- qom/object.c | 10 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6