On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 3:24 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
>
> Björn reported in [1] a case where a rv64 CPU is going through the
> profile code path to enable satp mode. In this case,the amount of
> extensions on top of the rv64 CPU made it compliant with the RVA22S64
> profile during the val
Daniel Henrique Barboza writes:
> Björn reported in [1] a case where a rv64 CPU is going through the
> profile code path to enable satp mode. In this case,the amount of
> extensions on top of the rv64 CPU made it compliant with the RVA22S64
> profile during the validation of CPU 0. When the subse
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 02:23:36PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Björn reported in [1] a case where a rv64 CPU is going through the
> profile code path to enable satp mode. In this case,the amount of
> extensions on top of the rv64 CPU made it compliant with the RVA22S64
> profile during
Björn reported in [1] a case where a rv64 CPU is going through the
profile code path to enable satp mode. In this case,the amount of
extensions on top of the rv64 CPU made it compliant with the RVA22S64
profile during the validation of CPU 0. When the subsequent CPUs were
initialized the static pro
