On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 6:53 AM Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> Switch the xilinx_axidma code away from bottom-half based ptimers to
> the new transaction-based ptimer API. This just requires adding
> begin/commit calls around the various places that modify the ptimer
> state, and using the new ptimer_i
On 10/17/19 5:06 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 16:01, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 10/17/19 3:21 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
Switch the xilinx_axidma code away from bottom-half based ptimers to
the new transaction-based ptimer API. This just requires adding
begi
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 16:01, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 10/17/19 3:21 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > Switch the xilinx_axidma code away from bottom-half based ptimers to
> > the new transaction-based ptimer API. This just requires adding
> > begin/commit calls around the va
Hi Peter,
On 10/17/19 3:21 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
Switch the xilinx_axidma code away from bottom-half based ptimers to
the new transaction-based ptimer API. This just requires adding
begin/commit calls around the various places that modify the ptimer
state, and using the new ptimer_init() fun
On 10/17/19 6:21 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Switch the xilinx_axidma code away from bottom-half based ptimers to
> the new transaction-based ptimer API. This just requires adding
> begin/commit calls around the various places that modify the ptimer
> state, and using the new ptimer_init() function
Switch the xilinx_axidma code away from bottom-half based ptimers to
the new transaction-based ptimer API. This just requires adding
begin/commit calls around the various places that modify the ptimer
state, and using the new ptimer_init() function to create the timer.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydel
