Re: [PATCH 26/36] next-cube: don't use rtc phase value of -1

2024-11-08 Thread Thomas Huth
Am Wed, 23 Oct 2024 09:58:42 +0100 schrieb Mark Cave-Ayland : > The rtc phase value of -1 is directly equivalent to using a phase value of 0 > so > simplify the logic to use an initial rtc phase of 0. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland > --- > hw/m68k/next-cube.c | 5 + > 1 file changed,

Re: [PATCH 26/36] next-cube: don't use rtc phase value of -1

2024-10-24 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
On 23/10/2024 11:37, BALATON Zoltan wrote: On Wed, 23 Oct 2024, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: The rtc phase value of -1 is directly equivalent to using a phase value of 0 so simplify the logic to use an initial rtc phase of 0. Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland --- hw/m68k/next-cube.c | 5 + 1 file

Re: [PATCH 26/36] next-cube: don't use rtc phase value of -1

2024-10-23 Thread BALATON Zoltan
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: The rtc phase value of -1 is directly equivalent to using a phase value of 0 so simplify the logic to use an initial rtc phase of 0. Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland --- hw/m68k/next-cube.c | 5 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) dif

[PATCH 26/36] next-cube: don't use rtc phase value of -1

2024-10-23 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
The rtc phase value of -1 is directly equivalent to using a phase value of 0 so simplify the logic to use an initial rtc phase of 0. Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland --- hw/m68k/next-cube.c | 5 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/m68k/next-cube.c b/hw/m68k/next-