On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:22:04PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> We incorrectly treat SVC 0xf0002 as a cacheflush request (which is a
> NOP for QEMU). This is the wrong syscall number, because in the
> svc-immediate OABI syscall numbers are all offset by the
> ARM_SYSCALL_BASE value and so the cor
On 4/20/20 11:22 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> We incorrectly treat SVC 0xf0002 as a cacheflush request (which is a
> NOP for QEMU). This is the wrong syscall number, because in the
> svc-immediate OABI syscall numbers are all offset by the
> ARM_SYSCALL_BASE value and so the correct insn is SVC 0x9f
We incorrectly treat SVC 0xf0002 as a cacheflush request (which is a
NOP for QEMU). This is the wrong syscall number, because in the
svc-immediate OABI syscall numbers are all offset by the
ARM_SYSCALL_BASE value and so the correct insn is SVC 0x9f0002.
(This is handled further down in the code wi
