On 08.11.19 09:53, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Test that doing a second blockdev-snapshot doesn't make the first
> overlay's backing file go away.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
> ---
> tests/qemu-iotests/273 | 76 +
> tests/qemu-iotests/273.out | 337 +
>
Am 08.11.2019 um 15:32 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
> On Fri 08 Nov 2019 09:53:12 AM CET, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > +# Test large write to a qcow2 image
>
> This doesn't belong here I guess :)
Yes, fixed.
> I wonder if this test could go in 245 instead.
The headline for 245 is "Test cases for th
Am 12.11.2019 um 17:07 hat Peter Krempa geschrieben:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 09:53:12 +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Test that doing a second blockdev-snapshot doesn't make the first
> > overlay's backing file go away.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
> > ---
> > tests/qemu-iotests/273 | 7
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 09:53:12 +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Test that doing a second blockdev-snapshot doesn't make the first
> overlay's backing file go away.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
> ---
> tests/qemu-iotests/273 | 76 +
> tests/qemu-iotests/273.out | 337 +++
On Fri 08 Nov 2019 09:53:12 AM CET, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> +# Test large write to a qcow2 image
This doesn't belong here I guess :)
I wonder if this test could go in 245 instead.
Berto
Test that doing a second blockdev-snapshot doesn't make the first
overlay's backing file go away.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
---
tests/qemu-iotests/273 | 76 +
tests/qemu-iotests/273.out | 337 +
tests/qemu-iotests/group | 1 +
3 files changed,
