On 11/4/24 19:53, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Coverity reports (CID 1564769, 1564770) that we potentially overflow
> by doing some 32x32 multiplies for something that ends up in a 64 bit
> value. Fix this by casting the first input to uint64_t to ensure a 64
> bit multiply is used.
>
> While we are at
Coverity reports (CID 1564769, 1564770) that we potentially overflow
by doing some 32x32 multiplies for something that ends up in a 64 bit
value. Fix this by casting the first input to uint64_t to ensure a 64
bit multiply is used.
While we are at it note why we split the calculation into stride
