On 8/8/23 20:07, Warner Losh wrote:
So, that's kinda why. I do agree with you that that would be a better
structure, but
can we use this structure for upstreaming and once we get the other issues
worked
out, we can do a restructure... We've moved things around a bit, and I'm also
waiting
for t
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 3:53 PM Richard Henderson <
richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 8/7/23 23:08, Karim Taha wrote:
> > From: Stacey Son
> >
> > Implement the following syscalls:
> > stat(2)
> > lstat(2)
> > fstat(2)
> > fstatat(2)
> > nstat
> > nfstat
> > nlstat
> >
> > Signed-off-by: S
On 8/7/23 23:08, Karim Taha wrote:
From: Stacey Son
Implement the following syscalls:
stat(2)
lstat(2)
fstat(2)
fstatat(2)
nstat
nfstat
nlstat
Signed-off-by: Stacey Son
Signed-off-by: Karim Taha
Why are all of these in os-stat.h instead of os-stat.c?
Is this attempting to avoid clang's war
From: Stacey Son
Implement the following syscalls:
stat(2)
lstat(2)
fstat(2)
fstatat(2)
nstat
nfstat
nlstat
Signed-off-by: Stacey Son
Signed-off-by: Karim Taha
---
bsd-user/freebsd/os-stat.h | 130 +
1 file changed, 130 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 bsd
