On 5/15/25 9:14 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 15/5/25 17:22, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
On 5/15/25 4:05 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 14/5/25 18:59, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
On 5/14/25 9:53 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 14/5/25 10:24, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 5/13/25 18:3
On 15/5/25 17:22, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
On 5/15/25 4:05 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 14/5/25 18:59, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
On 5/14/25 9:53 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 14/5/25 10:24, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 5/13/25 18:39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
arm_cpu_has_featu
On 5/15/25 4:05 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 14/5/25 18:59, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
On 5/14/25 9:53 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 14/5/25 10:24, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 5/13/25 18:39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
arm_cpu_has_feature() is equivalent of arm_feature(), howeve
On 14/5/25 18:59, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
On 5/14/25 9:53 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 14/5/25 10:24, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 5/13/25 18:39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
arm_cpu_has_feature() is equivalent of arm_feature(), however
while the latter uses CPUARMState so is target-sp
On 5/14/25 9:53 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 14/5/25 10:24, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 5/13/25 18:39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
arm_cpu_has_feature() is equivalent of arm_feature(), however
while the latter uses CPUARMState so is target-specific, the
former doesn't and can be calle
On 14/5/25 10:24, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 5/13/25 18:39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
arm_cpu_has_feature() is equivalent of arm_feature(), however
while the latter uses CPUARMState so is target-specific, the
former doesn't and can be called by target-agnostic code in hw/.
CPUARMState is
On 5/13/25 18:39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
arm_cpu_has_feature() is equivalent of arm_feature(), however
while the latter uses CPUARMState so is target-specific, the
former doesn't and can be called by target-agnostic code in hw/.
CPUARMState is no more target-specific than ARMCPU.
Did yo
arm_cpu_has_feature() is equivalent of arm_feature(), however
while the latter uses CPUARMState so is target-specific, the
former doesn't and can be called by target-agnostic code in hw/.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reviewed-by: Pierrick Bouvier
---
target/arm/cpu_has_feature.h | 2 ++
