On Mon, 2019-09-30 at 15:57 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 30.09.19 15:46, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-09-30 at 15:38 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> > > On 29.09.19 18:38, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 11:42 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> > > > > When using an external data fil
On 30.09.19 15:46, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-09-30 at 15:38 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 29.09.19 18:38, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 11:42 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
When using an external data file, there are no refcounts for data
clusters. We thus have to a
On Mon, 2019-09-30 at 15:38 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 29.09.19 18:38, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 11:42 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> > > When using an external data file, there are no refcounts for data
> > > clusters. We thus have to adjust the corruption test in this patch to
On 29.09.19 18:38, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 11:42 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
>> When using an external data file, there are no refcounts for data
>> clusters. We thus have to adjust the corruption test in this patch to
>> not be based around a data cluster allocation, but the L2
On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 11:42 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> When using an external data file, there are no refcounts for data
> clusters. We thus have to adjust the corruption test in this patch to
> not be based around a data cluster allocation, but the L2 table
> allocation (L2 tables are still refcou
When using an external data file, there are no refcounts for data
clusters. We thus have to adjust the corruption test in this patch to
not be based around a data cluster allocation, but the L2 table
allocation (L2 tables are still refcounted with external data files).
Doing so means this test wo
