Re: [PATCH 14/18] iotests: Make 110 work with data_file

2019-09-30 Thread Max Reitz
On 29.09.19 18:34, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 11:42 +0200, Max Reitz wrote: >> The only difference is that the json:{} filename of the image looks >> different. We actually do not care about that filename in this test, we >> are only interested in (1) that there is a json:{} fil

Re: [PATCH 14/18] iotests: Make 110 work with data_file

2019-09-30 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Mon, 2019-09-30 at 15:34 +0200, Max Reitz wrote: > On 29.09.19 18:34, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 11:42 +0200, Max Reitz wrote: > > > The only difference is that the json:{} filename of the image looks > > > different. We actually do not care about that filename in this test

Re: [PATCH 14/18] iotests: Make 110 work with data_file

2019-09-29 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 11:42 +0200, Max Reitz wrote: > The only difference is that the json:{} filename of the image looks > different. We actually do not care about that filename in this test, we > are only interested in (1) that there is a json:{} filename, and (2) > whether the backing filename

[PATCH 14/18] iotests: Make 110 work with data_file

2019-09-27 Thread Max Reitz
The only difference is that the json:{} filename of the image looks different. We actually do not care about that filename in this test, we are only interested in (1) that there is a json:{} filename, and (2) whether the backing filename can be constructed. So just filter out the json:{} data, th