On 4/12/22 02:56, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 at 23:14, Richard Henderson
wrote:
On 4/11/22 09:18, Peter Maydell wrote:
+ ESB 0011 0010 0001
+]
Why don't we decode bits [11:8] here? I see it's the same
as YIELD/WFE/WFI, but I'm not sure
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 at 23:14, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> On 4/11/22 09:18, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> + ESB 0011 0010 0001
> >> +]
> >
> > Why don't we decode bits [11:8] here? I see it's the same
> > as YIELD/WFE/WFI, but I'm not sure why we're not decodi
On 4/11/22 09:18, Peter Maydell wrote:
+ ESB 0011 0010 0001
+]
Why don't we decode bits [11:8] here? I see it's the same
as YIELD/WFE/WFI, but I'm not sure why we're not decoding
those bits in those insns either...
See page F4-7074 in H.a, where bits [
On Sat, 9 Apr 2022 at 01:18, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> Check for and defer any pending virtual SError.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> ---
> target/arm/helper.h| 1 +
> target/arm/a32.decode | 16 +-
> target/arm/t32.decode | 18 +++
> target/
Check for and defer any pending virtual SError.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target/arm/helper.h| 1 +
target/arm/a32.decode | 16 +-
target/arm/t32.decode | 18 +++
target/arm/op_helper.c | 45 ++
target/
