* Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Now with rs->pss we can already cache channels in pss->pss_channels. That
> pss_channel contains more infromation than rs->f because it's per-channel.
> So rs->f could be replaced by rss->pss[RAM_CHANNEL_PRECOPY].pss_channel,
> while rs->f itself is a bit va
Now with rs->pss we can already cache channels in pss->pss_channels. That
pss_channel contains more infromation than rs->f because it's per-channel.
So rs->f could be replaced by rss->pss[RAM_CHANNEL_PRECOPY].pss_channel,
while rs->f itself is a bit vague now.
Note that vanilla postcopy still sen
