25.02.2021 18:52, Eric Blake wrote:
On 2/25/21 8:57 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
25.02.2021 16:50, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
18.02.2021 23:15, Eric Blake wrote:
Previous commits (such as 6e280648, 75d34eb9) have mentioned that our
NBD server still sends unaligned fragments
On 2/25/21 8:57 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 25.02.2021 16:50, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 18.02.2021 23:15, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> Previous commits (such as 6e280648, 75d34eb9) have mentioned that our
>>> NBD server still sends unaligned fragments when an active layer with
>
On 2/25/21 7:50 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 18.02.2021 23:15, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Previous commits (such as 6e280648, 75d34eb9) have mentioned that our
>> NBD server still sends unaligned fragments when an active layer with
>> large advertised minimum block size is backed by another
25.02.2021 16:50, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
18.02.2021 23:15, Eric Blake wrote:
Previous commits (such as 6e280648, 75d34eb9) have mentioned that our
NBD server still sends unaligned fragments when an active layer with
large advertised minimum block size is backed by another layer with
18.02.2021 23:15, Eric Blake wrote:
Previous commits (such as 6e280648, 75d34eb9) have mentioned that our
NBD server still sends unaligned fragments when an active layer with
large advertised minimum block size is backed by another layer with a
smaller block size. Expand the test to actually cove
Previous commits (such as 6e280648, 75d34eb9) have mentioned that our
NBD server still sends unaligned fragments when an active layer with
large advertised minimum block size is backed by another layer with a
smaller block size. Expand the test to actually cover these scenario,
by using two differe
