On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 21:22, Keith Packard via wrote:
>
> The documentation says the vector is at 0xff80, instead of the
> previous value of 0xffc0. That value must have been a bug because
> the standard vector values (20, 21, 23, 25, 30) were all
> past the end of the array.
>
> Signed-o
The documentation says the vector is at 0xff80, instead of the
previous value of 0xffc0. That value must have been a bug because
the standard vector values (20, 21, 23, 25, 30) were all
past the end of the array.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
---
target/rx/helper.c | 2 +-
1 file changed,
