On 5/20/2024 10:16 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 21/05/2024 07.08, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 20/05/2024 19.47, Zide Chen wrote:
>>> Both cpu-pm and mem-lock are related to system resource overcommit, but
>>> they are separate from each other, in terms of how they are realized,
>>> and of course, th
On 5/20/2024 10:16 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 21/05/2024 07.08, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 20/05/2024 19.47, Zide Chen wrote:
>>> Both cpu-pm and mem-lock are related to system resource overcommit, but
>>> they are separate from each other, in terms of how they are realized,
>>> and of course, th
On 5/20/2024 10:16 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 21/05/2024 07.08, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 20/05/2024 19.47, Zide Chen wrote:
>>> Both cpu-pm and mem-lock are related to system resource overcommit, but
>>> they are separate from each other, in terms of how they are realized,
>>> and of course, th
On 21/05/2024 07.08, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 20/05/2024 19.47, Zide Chen wrote:
Both cpu-pm and mem-lock are related to system resource overcommit, but
they are separate from each other, in terms of how they are realized,
and of course, they are applied to different system resources.
It's temptin
On 20/05/2024 19.47, Zide Chen wrote:
Both cpu-pm and mem-lock are related to system resource overcommit, but
they are separate from each other, in terms of how they are realized,
and of course, they are applied to different system resources.
It's tempting to use separate command lines to specif
Both cpu-pm and mem-lock are related to system resource overcommit, but
they are separate from each other, in terms of how they are realized,
and of course, they are applied to different system resources.
It's tempting to use separate command lines to specify their behavior.
e.g., in the following
