Re: [PATCH 1/3] virtiofsd: Set up posix_lock hash table for root inode

* Vivek Goyal (vgo...@redhat.com) wrote: > We setup per inode hash table ->posix_lock to support remote posix locks. > But we forgot to initialize this table for root inode. > > Laszlo managed to trigger an issue where he sent a FUSE_FLUSH request for > root inode and lo_flush() found inode with i

Re: [PATCH 1/3] virtiofsd: Set up posix_lock hash table for root inode

We setup per inode hash table ->posix_lock to support remote posix locks. But we forgot to initialize this table for root inode. Laszlo managed to trigger an issue where he sent a FUSE_FLUSH request for root inode and lo_flush() found inode with inode->posix_lock NULL and accessing this table cras

[PATCH 1/3] virtiofsd: Set up posix_lock hash table for root inode

We setup per inode hash table ->posix_lock to support remote posix locks. But we forgot to initialize this table for root inode. Laszlo managed to trigger an issue where he sent a FUSE_FLUSH request for root inode and lo_flush() found inode with inode->posix_lock NULL and accessing this table cras