Re: [PATCH 1/3] hw/net/fsl_etsec/etsec.c: Switch to transaction-based ptimer API

2019-10-17 Thread Alistair Francis
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 6:42 AM Peter Maydell wrote: > > Switch the fsl_etsec code away from bottom-half based ptimers to > the new transaction-based ptimer API. This just requires adding > begin/commit calls around the various places that modify the ptimer > state, and using the new ptimer_init(

Re: [PATCH 1/3] hw/net/fsl_etsec/etsec.c: Switch to transaction-based ptimer API

2019-10-17 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 10/17/19 3:21 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: Switch the fsl_etsec code away from bottom-half based ptimers to the new transaction-based ptimer API. This just requires adding begin/commit calls around the various places that modify the ptimer state, and using the new ptimer_init() function to create

Re: [PATCH 1/3] hw/net/fsl_etsec/etsec.c: Switch to transaction-based ptimer API

2019-10-17 Thread Richard Henderson
On 10/17/19 6:21 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > Switch the fsl_etsec code away from bottom-half based ptimers to > the new transaction-based ptimer API. This just requires adding > begin/commit calls around the various places that modify the ptimer > state, and using the new ptimer_init() function to

[PATCH 1/3] hw/net/fsl_etsec/etsec.c: Switch to transaction-based ptimer API

2019-10-17 Thread Peter Maydell
Switch the fsl_etsec code away from bottom-half based ptimers to the new transaction-based ptimer API. This just requires adding begin/commit calls around the various places that modify the ptimer state, and using the new ptimer_init() function to create the timer. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell -