John Snow writes:
> If we remove the legacy parser, this formulation begins to fail because
> the body text is appended directly after the field list entry, which is
> invalid rST syntax.
>
> Markus: suggest where the new Exception(s) should go, if anywhere, and
> how to update the tests? I'm ass
If we remove the legacy parser, this formulation begins to fail because
the body text is appended directly after the field list entry, which is
invalid rST syntax.
Markus: suggest where the new Exception(s) should go, if anywhere, and
how to update the tests? I'm assuming deeply you'll want to.
S
