On Thu, May 26, 2022, 10:31 AM Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <
vsement...@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> On 4/8/22 20:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > The method is not popular, we prefer use vm.qmp() and then check
>
> Suddenly I found, that I missed a lot of existing users: in scripts, in
>
On 4/8/22 20:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
The method is not popular, we prefer use vm.qmp() and then check
Suddenly I found, that I missed a lot of existing users: in scripts, in avocado
tests.
Do you prefer to rename the method to "cmd()", and change all the occurrences, or keep
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 01:08:06PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022, 12:42 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 08:02:13PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> > wrote:
> > > The method is not popular, we prefer use vm.qmp() and then check
> > > success by h
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022, 12:42 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 08:02:13PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> wrote:
> > The method is not popular, we prefer use vm.qmp() and then check
> > success by hand.. But that's not optimal. To simplify movement to
> > vm.command() su
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 08:02:13PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> The method is not popular, we prefer use vm.qmp() and then check
> success by hand.. But that's not optimal. To simplify movement to
> vm.command() support same interface improvements like in vm.qmp() and
> rename to sh
The method is not popular, we prefer use vm.qmp() and then check
success by hand.. But that's not optimal. To simplify movement to
vm.command() support same interface improvements like in vm.qmp() and
rename to shorter vm.cmd().
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
---
python/qemu/machine
