On Wed, 02 Feb 2022 03:54:45 +0900,
Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 17:47, Yoshinori Sato
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 01 Feb 2022 15:48:58 +0900,
> > Thomas Huth wrote:
> > >
> > > On 31/01/2022 10.42, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> > > If you describe it like this, it sounds like you're no
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 17:47, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
>
> On Tue, 01 Feb 2022 15:48:58 +0900,
> Thomas Huth wrote:
> >
> > On 31/01/2022 10.42, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> > If you describe it like this, it sounds like you're now emulating a
> > buffer that is not there with real hardware? Is that really
On Tue, 01 Feb 2022 15:48:58 +0900,
Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> On 31/01/2022 10.42, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> > SCI does not have a fifo, it is necessary to send and receive
> > at a bit rate speed.
> > But, qemu's chardev backend does not have a buffer,
> > so it sends received data continuously.
>
On 31/01/2022 10.42, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
SCI does not have a fifo, it is necessary to send and receive
at a bit rate speed.
But, qemu's chardev backend does not have a buffer,
so it sends received data continuously.
By buffering the received data with the FIFO, continuous
received data ca
SCI does not have a fifo, it is necessary to send and receive
at a bit rate speed.
But, qemu's chardev backend does not have a buffer,
so it sends received data continuously.
By buffering the received data with the FIFO, continuous
received data can be received.
Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato
-