On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 03:08:38PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Markus Armbruster (arm...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Peter Xu writes:
> >
> > > Unfortunately, it was never correctly shown..
> > >
> > > This is only found when I started to look into making the blocktime
> > > feature
> >
* Markus Armbruster (arm...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Peter Xu writes:
>
> > Unfortunately, it was never correctly shown..
> >
> > This is only found when I started to look into making the blocktime feature
> > more useful (so as to avoid using bpftrace, even though I'm not sure which
> > one will be
Peter Xu writes:
> Unfortunately, it was never correctly shown..
>
> This is only found when I started to look into making the blocktime feature
> more useful (so as to avoid using bpftrace, even though I'm not sure which
> one will be harder to use..).
>
> So the old dump would look like this:
>
Unfortunately, it was never correctly shown..
This is only found when I started to look into making the blocktime feature
more useful (so as to avoid using bpftrace, even though I'm not sure which
one will be harder to use..).
So the old dump would look like this:
Postcopy vCPU Blocktime: 0-1,
