On 12/14/24 12:40, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
Maybe extend checkpatch to catch these in the future? (Not meant to be a
blocker)
I believe I have a way to enforce this at build-time, for a follow-up patch set.
r~
On 12/13/24 20:06, Richard Henderson wrote:
Since d36f165d952 (qdev: make properties array "const"), we can
define our Property structure const. Do this across the entire tree.
There are a few other minor changes:
- Two instances where it was obvious that an empty property list
could be
Am 13. Dezember 2024 19:06:30 UTC schrieb Richard Henderson
:
>Since d36f165d952 (qdev: make properties array "const"), we can
>define our Property structure const. Do this across the entire tree.
>
>There are a few other minor changes:
> - Two instances where it was obvious that an empty pro
On 13/12/24 20:06, Richard Henderson wrote:
Since d36f165d952 (qdev: make properties array "const"), we can
define our Property structure const. Do this across the entire tree.
There are a few other minor changes:
- Two instances where it was obvious that an empty property list
could be
On 12/13/24 13:06, Richard Henderson wrote:
Since d36f165d952 (qdev: make properties array "const"), we can
define our Property structure const. Do this across the entire tree.
There are a few other minor changes:
- Two instances where it was obvious that an empty property list
could be
Since d36f165d952 (qdev: make properties array "const"), we can
define our Property structure const. Do this across the entire tree.
There are a few other minor changes:
- Two instances where it was obvious that an empty property list
could be removed entirely. There are other empty lists
