Re: [PATCH 0/9] 9pfs: readdir optimization

2019-12-18 Thread Greg Kurz
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:05:29 +0100 Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > On Mittwoch, 18. Dezember 2019 08:59:37 CET you wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > > > It seems that there was an issue with the posting of these series. Threading > > is inexistant. All the emails appear scattered and unsorted in my ma

Re: [PATCH 0/9] 9pfs: readdir optimization

2019-12-18 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
On Mittwoch, 18. Dezember 2019 08:59:37 CET you wrote: > Hi Christian, > > It seems that there was an issue with the posting of these series. Threading > is inexistant. All the emails appear scattered and unsorted in my mailbox, > between 12/16 and 12/18... which is a bit painful. I'll try to find

Re: [PATCH 0/9] 9pfs: readdir optimization

2019-12-18 Thread Greg Kurz
Hi Christian, It seems that there was an issue with the posting of these series. Threading is inexistant. All the emails appear scattered and unsorted in my mailbox, between 12/16 and 12/18... which is a bit painful. I'll try to find some time to have a look anyway, but this greatly lowers the odd

[PATCH 0/9] 9pfs: readdir optimization

2019-12-17 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
As previously mentioned, I was investigating performance issues with 9pfs. Raw file read/write of 9pfs is actually quite good, provided that client picked a reasonable high msize (maximum message size). I would recommend to log a warning on 9p server side if a client attached with a small msize tha