On Mon, Jun 14 2021, Richard Henderson wrote:
> The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
> in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
>
>
> r~
>
>
> Richard Henderson (5):
> target/s390x: Expose load_psw and get_psw_mask to cpu.h
> target/s390x: Do not modify cpu s
On 2021-06-16 11:01 am, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15 2021, "jonathan.albrecht"
wrote:
On 2021-06-14 11:07 pm, Richard Henderson wrote:
The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
Thanks Richard! Peter and I tested t
On Tue, Jun 15 2021, "jonathan.albrecht"
wrote:
> On 2021-06-14 11:07 pm, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
>> in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
>>
>
> Thanks Richard! Peter and I tested this series against:
> * https://b
On Tue, Jun 15 2021, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 15.06.21 05:07, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
>> in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
>>
>
>
> Maybe add a Reported-by: jonathan.albre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> in the ri
On Wed, Jun 16 2021, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 6/16/21 3:38 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 15 2021, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>>> Richard Henderson writes:
>>>
The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
>>>
On 6/16/21 3:38 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15 2021, Alex Bennée wrote:
Richard Henderson writes:
The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
Still seeing issues running on s390x machine:
(...)
However runnin
On Tue, Jun 15 2021, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Richard Henderson writes:
>
>> The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
>> in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
>
> Still seeing issues running on s390x machine:
(...)
> However running on x86 backend everything seems
On 2021-06-14 11:07 pm, Richard Henderson wrote:
The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
Thanks Richard! Peter and I tested this series against:
* https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1886793
* https://bugs.launchpad.net
Alex Bennée writes:
> Richard Henderson writes:
>
>> The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
>> in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
>
> Still seeing issues running on s390x machine:
>
> 05:00:29 [ajb@qemu01:~/l/q/b/debug] s390x/signal-fixes|… 38 + retry.py -
Richard Henderson writes:
> The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
> in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
Still seeing issues running on s390x machine:
05:00:29 [ajb@qemu01:~/l/q/b/debug] s390x/signal-fixes|… 38 + retry.py -n 100
-c -- ./qemu-s390x ./tests
On 15.06.21 05:07, Richard Henderson wrote:
The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
Maybe add a Reported-by: jonathan.albre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
in the right patches?
Richard Henderson (5):
target/s390x: Expose
The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
r~
Richard Henderson (5):
target/s390x: Expose load_psw and get_psw_mask to cpu.h
target/s390x: Do not modify cpu state in s390_cpu_get_psw_mask
target/s390x: Improve s390_cpu_d
12 matches
Mail list logo
