Re: [PATCH 0/4] vl: Prioritize device realizations

2021-10-21 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 21.10.21 10:00, Peter Xu wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 09:17:57AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> I know, whenever someone proposes a way to tackle part of a challenging >> problem, everybody discovers their hopes and dreams and suddenly you >> have to go all the way to solve the complete

Re: [PATCH 0/4] vl: Prioritize device realizations

2021-10-21 Thread Peter Xu
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 09:17:57AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > I know, whenever someone proposes a way to tackle part of a challenging > problem, everybody discovers their hopes and dreams and suddenly you > have to go all the way to solve the complete problem. The end result is > that there

Re: [PATCH 0/4] vl: Prioritize device realizations

2021-10-21 Thread David Hildenbrand
> Yes I should follow this up, thanks for asking. > > Though after Markus and Igor pointed out to me that it's much more than types > of device and objects to order, I don't have a good way to fix the ordering > issue for good on all the problems; obviously current solution only applies to > devic

Re: [PATCH 0/4] vl: Prioritize device realizations

2021-10-20 Thread Peter Xu
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 03:44:08PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 18.08.21 21:42, Peter Xu wrote: > > This is a long pending issue that we haven't fixed. The issue is in QEMU we > > have implicit device ordering requirement when realizing, otherwise some of > > the > > device may not work p

Re: [PATCH 0/4] vl: Prioritize device realizations

2021-10-20 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 03:44:08PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 18.08.21 21:42, Peter Xu wrote: > > This is a long pending issue that we haven't fixed. The issue is in QEMU we > > have implicit device ordering requirement when realizing, otherwise some of > > the > > device may not work p

Re: [PATCH 0/4] vl: Prioritize device realizations

2021-10-20 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 20.10.21 15:48, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 03:44:08PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 18.08.21 21:42, Peter Xu wrote: >>> This is a long pending issue that we haven't fixed. The issue is in QEMU we >>> have implicit device ordering requirement when realizing, othe

Re: [PATCH 0/4] vl: Prioritize device realizations

2021-10-20 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 18.08.21 21:42, Peter Xu wrote: > This is a long pending issue that we haven't fixed. The issue is in QEMU we > have implicit device ordering requirement when realizing, otherwise some of > the > device may not work properly. > > The initial requirement comes from when vfio-pci starts to work

[PATCH 0/4] vl: Prioritize device realizations

2021-08-18 Thread Peter Xu
This is a long pending issue that we haven't fixed. The issue is in QEMU we have implicit device ordering requirement when realizing, otherwise some of the device may not work properly. The initial requirement comes from when vfio-pci starts to work with vIOMMUs. To make sure vfio-pci will get th