> On Feb 3, 2020, at 4:10 PM, Marc-André Lureau
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:08 PM Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>>
>> Oops, I completely forgot to add a "v5" on the subject line.
>>
>> (The changelog is there.)
>>
>> Let me know if I should resend.
>>
>> F.
>>
>>> On Feb 3, 2
Hi
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:08 PM Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>
> Oops, I completely forgot to add a "v5" on the subject line.
>
> (The changelog is there.)
>
> Let me know if I should resend.
>
> F.
>
> > On Feb 3, 2020, at 3:54 PM, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
> >
> > This improves the family of object
Oops, I completely forgot to add a "v5" on the subject line.
(The changelog is there.)
Let me know if I should resend.
F.
> On Feb 3, 2020, at 3:54 PM, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>
> This improves the family of object_property_add_uintXX_ptr helpers by enabling
> a default getter/setter only whe
This improves the family of object_property_add_uintXX_ptr helpers by enabling
a default getter/setter only when desired. To prevent an API behavioural change
(from clients that already used these helpers and did not want a setter), we
add a OBJ_PROP_FLAG_READ flag that allow clients to only have a
This improves the family of object_property_add_uintXX_ptr helpers by enabling
a default setter when desired. To prevent an API behavioural change (from
clients that already used these helpers and did not want a setter), we add a
"readonly" parameter that allow clients to only have a getter. Patch
