Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtiofsd: Fix lo_flush() and inode->posix_lock init

2020-12-08 Thread Vivek Goyal
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:51:34AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Hi Vivek, > > On 12/07/20 19:30, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > Laszlo is writing a virtiofs client for OVMF and noticed that if he > > sends fuse FLUSH command for directory object, virtiofsd crashes. > > virtiofsd does not expect a FLUSH ar

Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtiofsd: Fix lo_flush() and inode->posix_lock init

2020-12-07 Thread Laszlo Ersek
Hi Vivek, On 12/07/20 19:30, Vivek Goyal wrote: > Laszlo is writing a virtiofs client for OVMF and noticed that if he > sends fuse FLUSH command for directory object, virtiofsd crashes. > virtiofsd does not expect a FLUSH arriving for a directory object. > > This patch series has one of the patch

Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtiofsd: Fix lo_flush() and inode->posix_lock init

2020-12-07 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20201207183021.22752-1-vgo...@redhat.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Type: series Message-id: 20201207183021.22752-1-vgo...@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH 0/3] virtiofsd: Fix lo_flush() and

[PATCH 0/3] virtiofsd: Fix lo_flush() and inode->posix_lock init

2020-12-07 Thread Vivek Goyal
Laszlo is writing a virtiofs client for OVMF and noticed that if he sends fuse FLUSH command for directory object, virtiofsd crashes. virtiofsd does not expect a FLUSH arriving for a directory object. This patch series has one of the patches which fixes that. It also has couple of posix lock fixes