Re: [PATCH 0/3] Vhost-user: replace _SLAVE_ with _BACKEND_

2023-01-30 Thread Stephen Hemminger via
On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 11:45:45 +0100 Maxime Coquelin wrote: > This series continues the work done to get rid of harmful > language in the Vhost-user specification. > > While the spec texts were changed to replace slave with > backend, the protocol features and messages names hadn't > been changed.

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Vhost-user: replace _SLAVE_ with _BACKEND_

2023-01-30 Thread Maxime Coquelin
On 1/30/23 12:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:45:45AM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote: This series continues the work done to get rid of harmful language in the Vhost-user specification. I prefer a positive "switch to a more inclusive terminology". To consider if you k

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Vhost-user: replace _SLAVE_ with _BACKEND_

2023-01-30 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:45:45AM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > This series continues the work done to get rid of harmful > language in the Vhost-user specification. I prefer a positive "switch to a more inclusive terminology". To consider if you keep doing this work. > While the spec texts we

[PATCH 0/3] Vhost-user: replace _SLAVE_ with _BACKEND_

2023-01-30 Thread Maxime Coquelin
This series continues the work done to get rid of harmful language in the Vhost-user specification. While the spec texts were changed to replace slave with backend, the protocol features and messages names hadn't been changed. This series renames remaining occurences in the spec and make use of