On 5/9/22 08:42, Lukáš Doktor wrote:
Dne 06. 05. 22 v 20:55 Lukáš Doktor napsal(a):
Hello Paolo, folks, I gave it a try (on top of the f9fc8932) and
it's better than the f9fc8932, better than the previous patch by
Stefan, but still I'm not reaching the performance of d7482ffe97
(before the f9fc8
Dne 06. 05. 22 v 20:55 Lukáš Doktor napsal(a):
> Hello Paolo, folks, I gave it a try (on top of the f9fc8932) and it's better
> than the f9fc8932, better than the previous patch by Stefan, but still I'm
> not reaching the performance of d7482ffe97 (before the f9fc8932 commit):
>
> f9f| 0.0
Hello Paolo, folks, I gave it a try (on top of the f9fc8932) and it's better
than the f9fc8932, better than the previous patch by Stefan, but still I'm not
reaching the performance of d7482ffe97 (before the f9fc8932 commit):
f9f| 0.0 | -2.8 | 0.6
stefan | -3.1 | -1.2 | -2.2
paolo | 5.3 |
Together, these two patches fix the performance regression induced by
QemuSemaphore; individually they don't though.
6.2:
iops: min=58051, max=62260, avg=60282.57, stdev=1081.18, samples=30
clat percentiles (usec): 1.00th=[ 490], 99.99th=[ 775]
iops: min=59401, max=
