On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 11:38 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:27:30AM +0200, Albert Esteve wrote:
> >Albert Esteve
> >
> >Senior Software Engineer
> >
> >Red Hat
> >
> >aest...@redhat.com
> >
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 9:38 AM Stefano Garzarella
> >wrote:
> >>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:27:30AM +0200, Albert Esteve wrote:
Albert Esteve
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat
aest...@redhat.com
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 9:38 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Albert Esteve wrote:
>VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_ADD
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 11:28:56AM +0200, Albert Esteve wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 11:18 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 11:12:32AM +0200, Albert Esteve wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:44 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 11:18 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 11:12:32AM +0200, Albert Esteve wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:44 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Albert Esteve wrote:
> > > > VHOST_USER_BACKEND_S
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 11:12:32AM +0200, Albert Esteve wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:44 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Albert Esteve wrote:
> > > VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_ADD and
> > > VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_REMOVE state
>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:44 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Albert Esteve wrote:
> > VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_ADD and
> > VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_REMOVE state
> > in the spec that they return 0 for successful
> > operations, non-zero ot
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Albert Esteve wrote:
> VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_ADD and
> VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_REMOVE state
> in the spec that they return 0 for successful
> operations, non-zero otherwise. However,
> implementation relies on the return types
> of the v
Albert Esteve
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat
aest...@redhat.com
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 9:38 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Albert Esteve wrote:
> >VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_ADD and
> >VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_REMOVE state
> >in th
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Albert Esteve wrote:
VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_ADD and
VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_REMOVE state
in the spec that they return 0 for successful
operations, non-zero otherwise. However,
implementation relies on the return types
of the virtio-dmab
VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_ADD and
VHOST_USER_BACKEND_SHARED_OBJECT_REMOVE state
in the spec that they return 0 for successful
operations, non-zero otherwise. However,
implementation relies on the return types
of the virtio-dmabuf library, with opposite
semantics (true if everything is correc
10 matches
Mail list logo