On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 9:04 PM Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> On 12/16/19 1:18 AM, Carlos Santos wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 8:06 PM Carlos Santos wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 9:47 AM Peter Maydell
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 13:39, wrote:
>
> Fro
On 12/16/19 1:18 AM, Carlos Santos wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 8:06 PM Carlos Santos wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 9:47 AM Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 13:39, wrote:
From: Carlos Santos
uClibc defines _SC_LEVEL1_ICACHE_LINESIZE and _SC_
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 8:06 PM Carlos Santos wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 9:47 AM Peter Maydell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 13:39, wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Carlos Santos
> > >
> > > uClibc defines _SC_LEVEL1_ICACHE_LINESIZE and _SC_LEVEL1_DCACHE_LINESIZE
> > > but the corres
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 9:47 AM Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 13:39, wrote:
> >
> > From: Carlos Santos
> >
> > uClibc defines _SC_LEVEL1_ICACHE_LINESIZE and _SC_LEVEL1_DCACHE_LINESIZE
> > but the corresponding sysconf calls returns -1, which is a valid result,
> > meaning that
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 13:39, wrote:
>
> From: Carlos Santos
>
> uClibc defines _SC_LEVEL1_ICACHE_LINESIZE and _SC_LEVEL1_DCACHE_LINESIZE
> but the corresponding sysconf calls returns -1, which is a valid result,
> meaning that the limit is indeterminate.
>
> Handle this situation using the fallb
From: Carlos Santos
uClibc defines _SC_LEVEL1_ICACHE_LINESIZE and _SC_LEVEL1_DCACHE_LINESIZE
but the corresponding sysconf calls returns -1, which is a valid result,
meaning that the limit is indeterminate.
Handle this situation using the fallback values instead of crashing due
to an assertion f
