Il mar 6 set 2022, 07:01 Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
> Next, permit me a few words on writing tests. For me, a unit test fails
> by crashing. Crashing with a nice message is optional. The more likely
> the failure, the more useful is niceness. Complete niceness is
> impossible --- if we cou
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> In CID 1432593, Coverity complains that the result of qdict_crumple()
> might leak if it is not a dictionary. This is not a practical concern
> since the test would fail immediately with a NULL pointer dereference
> in qdict_size().
>
> However, it is not nice to depend o
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> In CID 1432593, Coverity complains that the result of qdict_crumple()
> might leak if it is not a dictionary. This is not a practical concern
> since the test would fail immediately with a NULL pointer dereference
> in qdict_size().
>
> However, it is not nice to depend
In CID 1432593, Coverity complains that the result of qdict_crumple()
might leak if it is not a dictionary. This is not a practical concern
since the test would fail immediately with a NULL pointer dereference
in qdict_size().
However, it is not nice to depend on qdict_size() crashing, so add an
