On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:26 PM Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> When guest_base != 0, we were not coordinating the usage of
> TCG_REG_TMP0 as base properly, leading to a previous zero-extend
> of the input address being discarded.
>
> Shuffle the alignment check to the front, because that does not
>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:26 PM Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> When guest_base != 0, we were not coordinating the usage of
> TCG_REG_TMP0 as base properly, leading to a previous zero-extend
> of the input address being discarded.
>
> Shuffle the alignment check to the front, because that does not
>
On 2022/10/24 7:33, Richard Henderson wrote:
When guest_base != 0, we were not coordinating the usage of
TCG_REG_TMP0 as base properly, leading to a previous zero-extend
of the input address being discarded.
Shuffle the alignment check to the front, because that does not
depend on the zero-ext
When guest_base != 0, we were not coordinating the usage of
TCG_REG_TMP0 as base properly, leading to a previous zero-extend
of the input address being discarded.
Shuffle the alignment check to the front, because that does not
depend on the zero-extend, and it keeps the register usage clear.
Set b
