On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 12:30 AM Philipp Tomsich
wrote:
>
> When commit 0643c12e4b dropped the 'x-' prefix for Zb[abcs] and set
> them to be enabled by default, the comment about experimental
> extensions was kept in place above them. This moves it down a few
> lines to only cover experimental ext
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 12:30 AM Philipp Tomsich
wrote:
>
> When commit 0643c12e4b dropped the 'x-' prefix for Zb[abcs] and set
> them to be enabled by default, the comment about experimental
> extensions was kept in place above them. This moves it down a few
> lines to only cover experimental ext
Cc'ing qemu-trivial@
On 6/1/22 14:40, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
When commit 0643c12e4b dropped the 'x-' prefix for Zb[abcs] and set
them to be enabled by default, the comment about experimental
extensions was kept in place above them. This moves it down a few
lines to only cover experimental exten
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 10:29 PM Philipp Tomsich
wrote:
>
> When commit 0643c12e4b dropped the 'x-' prefix for Zb[abcs] and set
> them to be enabled by default, the comment about experimental
> extensions was kept in place above them. This moves it down a few
> lines to only cover experimental ext
When commit 0643c12e4b dropped the 'x-' prefix for Zb[abcs] and set
them to be enabled by default, the comment about experimental
extensions was kept in place above them. This moves it down a few
lines to only cover experimental extensions.
References: 0643c12e4b ("target/riscv: Enable bitmanip Z