Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: Fix initialized value for cur_pmmask

On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 7:48 PM Weiwei Li wrote: > > We initialize cur_pmmask as -1(UINT32_MAX/UINT64_MAX) and regard it > as if pointer mask is disabled in current implementation. However, > the addresses for vector load/store will be adjusted to zero in this > case and -1(UINT32_MAX/UINT64_MAX)

Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: Fix initialized value for cur_pmmask

On 2023/6/10 17:46, Weiwei Li wrote: We initialize cur_pmmask as -1(UINT32_MAX/UINT64_MAX) and regard it as if pointer mask is disabled in current implementation. However, the addresses for vector load/store will be adjusted to zero in this case and -1(UINT32_MAX/UINT64_MAX) is valid value for

[PATCH] target/riscv: Fix initialized value for cur_pmmask

We initialize cur_pmmask as -1(UINT32_MAX/UINT64_MAX) and regard it as if pointer mask is disabled in current implementation. However, the addresses for vector load/store will be adjusted to zero in this case and -1(UINT32_MAX/UINT64_MAX) is valid value for pmmask when pointer mask is enabled. Sig