On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:40 AM Bin Meng wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:32 AM Dylan Jhong wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:59:55PM +0800, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:15 AM Dylan Jhong wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Although the AE350 has not been upstream (pr
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:32 AM Dylan Jhong wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:59:55PM +0800, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:15 AM Dylan Jhong wrote:
> > >
> > > Although the AE350 has not been upstream (preparing for v2),
> > > the reset vector of the AE350 is known to
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:59:55PM +0800, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:15 AM Dylan Jhong wrote:
> >
> > Although the AE350 has not been upstream (preparing for v2),
> > the reset vector of the AE350 is known to be at the 2G position,
> > so this patch is corrected in advance
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:15 AM Dylan Jhong wrote:
>
> Although the AE350 has not been upstream (preparing for v2),
> the reset vector of the AE350 is known to be at the 2G position,
> so this patch is corrected in advance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dylan Jhong
> Signed-off-by: Ruinland ChuanTzu Tsai
>
Although the AE350 has not been upstream (preparing for v2),
the reset vector of the AE350 is known to be at the 2G position,
so this patch is corrected in advance.
Signed-off-by: Dylan Jhong
Signed-off-by: Ruinland ChuanTzu Tsai
---
target/riscv/cpu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1