On 5/7/23 16:45, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 7/4/23 18:00, Alex Bennée wrote:
Peter Maydell writes:
If you build QEMU with the clang sanitizer enabled, you can see it
fire when running the arm-cpu-features test:
$ QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./build/arm-clang/qemu-system-aarch64
./build/arm-clang/te
On 7/4/23 18:00, Alex Bennée wrote:
Peter Maydell writes:
If you build QEMU with the clang sanitizer enabled, you can see it
fire when running the arm-cpu-features test:
$ QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./build/arm-clang/qemu-system-aarch64
./build/arm-clang/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features
[...]
../../targ
On 7/4/23 17:43, Peter Maydell wrote:
If you build QEMU with the clang sanitizer enabled, you can see it
fire when running the arm-cpu-features test:
$ QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./build/arm-clang/qemu-system-aarch64
./build/arm-clang/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features
[...]
../../target/arm/cpu64.c:125:19: r
Peter Maydell writes:
> If you build QEMU with the clang sanitizer enabled, you can see it
> fire when running the arm-cpu-features test:
>
> $ QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./build/arm-clang/qemu-system-aarch64
> ./build/arm-clang/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features
> [...]
> ../../target/arm/cpu64.c:125:19: ru
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 at 16:52, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> On 4/7/23 17:43, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > If you build QEMU with the clang sanitizer enabled, you can see it
> > fire when running the arm-cpu-features test:
> >
> > $ QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./build/arm-clang/qemu-system-aarch64
> > ./buil
On 4/7/23 17:43, Peter Maydell wrote:
If you build QEMU with the clang sanitizer enabled, you can see it
fire when running the arm-cpu-features test:
$ QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./build/arm-clang/qemu-system-aarch64
./build/arm-clang/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features
[...]
../../target/arm/cpu64.c:125:19: r
If you build QEMU with the clang sanitizer enabled, you can see it
fire when running the arm-cpu-features test:
$ QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./build/arm-clang/qemu-system-aarch64
./build/arm-clang/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features
[...]
../../target/arm/cpu64.c:125:19: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too l