On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 11:22:10AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 02:21:08PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 23:23, Joe Komlodi wrote:
> > >
> > > address_space_write_rom_internal can take in a NULL pointer for ptr if
> > > it's only doing cache flushes inst
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 02:21:08PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 23:23, Joe Komlodi wrote:
> >
> > address_space_write_rom_internal can take in a NULL pointer for ptr if
> > it's only doing cache flushes instead of populating the ROM.
> >
> > However, if building with --enabl
On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 23:23, Joe Komlodi wrote:
>
> address_space_write_rom_internal can take in a NULL pointer for ptr if
> it's only doing cache flushes instead of populating the ROM.
>
> However, if building with --enable-ubsan, incrementing buf causes ubsan
> to go off when doing cache flushes
On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 10:22:36PM +, Joe Komlodi wrote:
> address_space_write_rom_internal can take in a NULL pointer for ptr if
> it's only doing cache flushes instead of populating the ROM.
>
> However, if building with --enable-ubsan, incrementing buf causes ubsan
> to go off when doing ca
address_space_write_rom_internal can take in a NULL pointer for ptr if
it's only doing cache flushes instead of populating the ROM.
However, if building with --enable-ubsan, incrementing buf causes ubsan
to go off when doing cache flushes, since it will trigger on pointer
arithmetic on a NULL poin
